Riding the Rapids

We recently spent a few days hiking up mountains, camping and white-water rafting in Wyoming and Montana, because isn’t that what people who are afraid of heights (me) and can’t swim (yeah, me, again) do for fun? And it was fun. It’s good to push out of the comfort zone.

Most parents and the other adults who care for and work with children are quite serious about helping them get out of their supposed comfort zones and into a healthier lifestyle. Recently, I was speaking to a group of adults about the topic, “Raising Mentally Healthy Children.” We spent our time focused on what we can do.

One problem that arises in these conversations – whether in a group, one-on-one, or with a family, is that making time for change seems impossible. The days are packed, and nothing on the schedule seems negotiable. Yet, in reality, what’s not negotiable is what humans need to be healthy and thriving.

What most kids need, and what we need, too, is more appropriately divvied-up time. For example, children and teens benefit from a solid two hours or more of physical activity every day. They need time outdoors, in nature, for their immune systems, Vitamin D, circadian rhythms and even their eyesight development. The near-and-far variation in focus that being outdoors elicits promotes healthy eyesight in young children; kids are supposed to go from crouching down to study a beetle to peering across the field to see if that’s a hawk in the tree and then taking off running to make sure. Optimally, they’re outside for at least two or so hours every day – more on weekends.

Kids need enough sleep – probably 9 or 10 hours a night, with an absence of screens. Recent research links high levels of artificial light at night (ALAN) with increased rates of cancer due to disruption of the circadian rhythm. An immediate risk with insufficient sleep is the attention system. Sleep-deprived people are irritable, inattentive, forgetful, disorganized and generally not fun to be around. Sleep-deprived drivers test as impaired, much like those with alcohol and/or drugs in their system. Think about inexperienced and sleep-deprived teenagers driving to and from school and work, often in the dark.

Kids, and we adults, need unstructured time. Most of the adults present had a creative hobby or two, and we all agreed that it takes time to shift gears into that hobby. It’s hard to walk in the door after work and immediately pick up a paintbrush, or guitar, or journal, or woodworking tools, and be in flow. The segue into creativity requires a sort of almost boring downtime – something many adults and children avoid compulsively through electronics. 

I can’t tell people what sacrifices have to be made for their family to have a healthier life. It varies from family to family, and it is never easy. It might be simple or quite complex, but it is never easy. However – after the white-water part, when you aren’t on nature’s roller coaster, there are always some smooth, easy times ahead. Thank you to all the parents who go for it – who strive to be sure their children to have the range of experiences they need to grow up resilient, curious and confident.

Hard Changes

Most of us have some changes to make. And most changes are not so easy. That’s why people postpone them, or poke at the edges, or just pretend the problem will go away by itself. Sometimes people convince themselves there isn’t even a problem, really; that it just depends how you look at it. Maybe so. But maybe there’s something that needs changing.

Let’s say you have a teenage child, or a child approaching the teens. S/he is cranky, sullen, uncooperative with chores, sulks during family meals and resists being on time for school and other appointments. S/he wants to spend time alone, in the bedroom, with electronics. The child is depressed and/or anxious and/or obsessive and/or perpetually angry. You know the situation will change, one way or the other. Everything changes. If you do nothing, you are gambling that your child will continue down this road and somehow, at 18 or 19 or 20, wake up, shake themselves off like a wet Golden Retriever and come out of their bedroom, smile and say, “Wow! How could I have been so wrong?!”

Yeah, I doubt it, too.

If you have this situation and need to take it on, it can be hard to know where to start. Here’s a suggestion: if the situation is not a crisis, then the most practical first step may be to start with yourself.

You will have to change. Perhaps you have to start the change process by being sure that all the adults in the house are on the same page in your expectations. Perhaps you need to get yourself on the right path.

You go first. You get enough fresh air, and time in nature, and sleep, and healthy nutrition, and balanced physical activity. You strive to do interesting and challenging things in what little free time you have. You will, quite naturally and incidentally, spend less passive screen time. You’ll be leading from strength rather than being a target for adolescents’ favorite criticism: that we adults are hypocrites. You’ll be in a much better stance to steer positive changes for your tween or teen.  

Not another horrible day

A different day, another awful situation. 

A child, or teen, or young adult has been struggling with emotional turmoil and is tumbling into danger. They confide in a friend, or maybe a few friends.

They may have “met” someone in an online chat and now this person is their “boyfriend” or “girlfriend,” and they are planning to run way to meet this person.

Perhaps the young person has been “sexting” with someone they know personally, or “met” online, and now are being threatened with “sextortion,” that the images of them will be spread around, unless they meet some demand. This has recently led to many teen and young adult suicides.

Perhaps the young person shares that they are a victim of abuse.

Or, perhaps they stumbled upon, or were led to, the terrible misinformation that hurting oneself is a useful way to cope with painful feelings. The young person proceeds to experiment with self-harm, and posts online about it.

So-called friends hear the plan, listen to the horrible stories, or see the images of scratches, cuts or burns, and fail to turn to an adult for guidance.

Every parent I’ve ever spoken to is under the impression that their child would, of course, come to them if a friend were in grave danger. And sometimes that is true, but an awful lot of the time – in almost any of these kinds of incidents I’ve ever encountered in clinical practice or consulted on, as it happens – that was not the case. The case was, almost every time, that other young people knew about the plan to run away, or the abuse, or the self-harm, and did not seek the guidance of an adult.

Sometimes these “friends” have an unflagging alliance, suddenly, to keeping promises (unlike the promises they have made to you, dear parent, about everything from cleaning their room to homework being done well to treating your automobile with respect). Sometimes they believe they are better equipped to help than an adult would be, although they cannot arrest an abuser, drive someone to the emergency room or help them connect with a mental health professional for counseling, and their capacity to manage extreme distress is probably not much better than the troubled friend’s skills. Sometimes they dread social disapproval for breaking the rule that you keep adults out of it, whether the “it” is someone self-harming, or sharing that they are a victim of abuse, or are planning to run away from home to meet up with the “boyfriend” they “met” online.

I urge you to have frequent, open conversations about these topics with your young people. Make them age appropriate; be calm and encouraging. If you are too stressed out, you may be misread as “angry.” Remember that adolescents go through a stage where their brain interprets almost every non-happy facial expression as “angry.” If that happens, the conversation will probably be a complete failure.

Be calm, be matter-of-fact, and be sincere. Ask questions, too:

How do the people you know handle things like a friend telling them this kind of stuff?

If this was your friend, what would you do?

If it were (fill in the blank for some close friend or family member), what would you want their friends to do in this type of situation?

Why do you think people are reluctant to ask adults for help with this?

What would make an adult seem safe to go to with this problem?

Don’t lecture; have the conversation. It may be a conversation that occurs for a few minutes at a time over an extended period. That’s okay; sometimes a few sentence and letting it simmer is what’s necessary.  

You may, without knowing it, be setting the groundwork to save a life.

Boundaries, Fences and the Berlin Wall

My cousin George died a few years ago, still with Soviet bullet fragments in one leg from his part in helping people escape from East Germany to the west. He had been a young man seemingly allergic to caution and willing to risk death to help others through what was intended to be an implacable barrier, the old Berlin Wall.

There are walls, and fences, and boundaries. The fences around our back yard allow bunnies to slip from one yard to the next. Yesterday, a squirrel chased a small bunny – not much bigger than said squirrel. The bunny escaped under the fence; the squirrel scurried up the fence to be sure the bunny was banished to the neighbor’s yard. The bunny, meanwhile, scampered right back into our yard. Up above, the squirrel looked left and right for the bunny. They had, apparently, an issue with boundaries.

Boundaries.  Twenty-plus years ago, boundaries were discussed most often in therapy, helping clients, often victims of emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse, learn how to put up practical, realistic limits for interactions with others. As the topic became more commonly known, wise writers and speakers (Brene Brown, for example) provided practical and inspiring information about developing and maintaining these healthy limits.

Like anything else, though, something good can be misused.

Medications that are essential to reduce some pain for someone in the final stages of cancer kill non-patients via drug abuse.

Entire genres of horror movies revolve around practical items used as devices of mayhem.

And the important psychological concept of boundaries – that we are each distinct beings and have a right to dignity and mutual respect ¬ is weaponized, like so much else in therapy, by far too many people.

As an example, consider the meme that “No is a complete sentence.”  That’s fine, as far it goes. But how often is that level of curtness warranted?

Husband: “Would you like to go out for ice cream?”

Lori: “No.”

Okay, for one thing, unless I am on a medically required pre-surg fast I wouldn’t ever say no to ice cream, so it’s ludicrous on that count. Secondly, it’s just rude. “No.” Better: no, thank you; tomorrow would be better, or, No, not this instant; could we go after I finish this paperwork?

No is a complete sentence, and optimally a loud one, when someone behaves inappropriately – then drawing attention to the need to stop an encroachment makes “NO! NO! NO!” a complete paragraph.

But the magical complete “No” is the least of my concerns. What happens more is the application of “I’m setting a boundary” when the person (usually a gaslighting partner or manipulative family member) really means, I’ve decided to be mean to you and I am using the magic hall pass word of boundary to get away with it. It’s totally legitimate to set a boundary. Yet, when used to justify inconsiderate behavior, it becomes a useful tool gone bad, a well-oiled emotional chainsaw in the wrong hands.

Of course, there are many people who refuse to accept reasonable boundaries.

For example, the fact, grandparents, that your (and my) fantasy of grandparent-life looked one way does not impose that script on our adult children. Whether we like it or not, they largely write that script and we can be enthusiastic about our roles, or be miserable grumbles and find ourselves little more than walk-ons.

Adult children who are not financially dependent on you do not need your unsolicited guidance on what they should be doing with their money. That conversation reasonably happens when they breach their “I’m a grownup boundary” by asking for money. They have, at that point, called you up from the Parent Reserves to Active Duty, and at that point you can ask questions, like, exactly what are they proposing to “pay off” with your IRA distribution for the entire year? Counter their complaints about boundaries that they are the ones opening that door.

When someone brings up the boundary word, it is time to breathe, ask some clarifying questions, and then take some time to reflect.

Does this feel like gameplaying – do the “boundaries” in this relationship keep shifting like quicksand?

Can you discern the difference between your disappointment and actual manipulation and meanness?

Does this sound as if the person is using psychological terminology to justify distancing from family? Is it possible that there are factors you don’t know about, or don’t sufficiently understand, that make this reasonable to them and for them at this time? This is entirely separate from you being disappointed.  Example: if big family holidays include family members who have been cruel, or abusive, or harshly critical, or have bullying senses of “humor” towards this person, the person placing a boundary up is acting in reasonable self-interest.

Usually, in the short term, the uncomfortable fact is that you can’t change the situation; you must figure out how to adapt. Pushing against the decision will, inadvertently, reinforce the decision; your arguments, tears and complaints will be interpreted as more evidence of disrespect for their asserted interpersonal boundaries – whether they are emotional boundaries, actual physical distance, or the dire separation equivalent to the old Berlin Wall.

Why didn’t you call me?

The Mystery of the Missing Phone Call

If you leave voicemail and I do not call you back, odds are it is because the voicemail did not come through, or, as sometimes happens due to cell phones, it was impossible to understand.  During 2024, there was a week in the autumn in which my cell phone record clearly shows no phone calls and yet later, several people complained about having called and receiving no call back. Their number popped up showing they’d called during the week in question, but the cell phone call logs of that week showed no such call. These things happen; it is regrettable and out of your, and my, control. If there is no call in a day or so during the business week, please call again! 

If you email me and ask me to call you, I will email back and invite you to call me. Sometimes people find this annoying or avoidant. I have two reasons for this.

First, I cannot be sure that whomever is emailing (or texting) is the person in question. That is why we therapists have requests about not sending confidential information by text or email.  Believe it or not, several times in my over quarter-century in practice, people have left voicemail or email with a name and number that was not their own. They had decided that “Alex” was in need of a therapist. In their imagination, leaving unsuspecting me a message to call “Alex” was a way to have “Alex” unexpectedly encounter a real, live therapist and jump at the chance to make an appointment. This is not how it ends up, believe me. On occasion, people have called and directly requested that I call some family member or friend, and I decline. I appreciate the honesty in the latter case, but it is still inappropriate.

Secondly, I cannot be sure that I will be calling when it is safe and private.

Thanks for calling!

Stress…And a Lesson From Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBTi) helps people with insomnia via examining and, where appropriate, helping them change their behaviors and thoughts surrounding the issue of sleep.  One important factor we explore are called “Sleep Safety Behaviors.” These are habits which people believe are helpful for sleep.  Some sleep safety behaviors are in fact very helpful, such as avoiding screens for a couple of hours before bedtime, using soft, warm light sources in the evening, and avoiding upsetting discussions before bedtime. Other sleep safety behaviors are counter-productive, but if a person is convinced that they are helpful the anxiety around giving them up ends up disrupting the process of falling or staying asleep. The objective is to have positive habits around sleep, not unhelpful sleep safety behaviors. It is not as easy or obvious as it might sound.

For example, many people use alcohol as a type of sleep safety behavior. They believe it helps them relax and unwind, and seem to either not know, or disregard, that it actually is a sleep disruptor. Alcohol-fueled sleep usually involves waking up in the middle of the night as the effects of alcohol wear off. It also disrupts the quality of sleep. However, the person convinced that they “need” a drink to sleep may become so anxious about going without the drink that they have difficulty falling asleep, which they attribute (wrongly) to the absence of alcohol.

In the same way, don’t most people have some sort of “stress safety behaviors” to cope with stressful situations or extended times of stress? Some are helpful and constructive, and others are terribly unhelpful and even destructive.  Some are fairly neutral until taken to excess; an ounce or so of chocolate as a snack is one thing; a pound is another. Odds are, you know someone who clings to a stress safety behavior even though it is clear as day that it is unhelpful and even harmful. You may have encountered the futility of trying to convince the person that the extra drinks, the avoidance, the angry outbursts to vent over and over, merely get in the way.

Imagine a person for whom life has delivered a set of one-two punches – illness, a hurricane or two, unexpected car repairs. There are all sorts of paperwork and bills to tackle, and after a long day of work it is all too much. He takes an evening off to binge watch a favorite series, and then, the next day, everything is one more day behind, one more day piled up, and even more overwhelming – too much to be tackled, again, after a long and wearying day. Surely there is a half a season or so of something that will distract from the looming piles of paper.

Perhaps the person doesn’t binge-watch. Perhaps she enjoys a glass of wine, or two, or three, or, heck, why leave only one glass in the bottle? She adds poor sleep and the three days it takes for the full effect of alcohol to leave the brain to the problems still piling up on the table. Perhaps he gets caught up in a vortex of videos about things he cannot afford – certainly not at this moment – and adds envy and resentment to the problems at hand.

Odds are, too, you know people who have some good “stress safety behaviors.” Those habits reinforce resilience. You might notice some people seem to surf through the ups and downs of stressful times without falling apart or adding to the trouble at hand. If you are that someone, that’s wonderful; stick with it. If you know some people like that, but are not one yourself, perhaps you might give some positive stress safety behaviors a try.

If I were making an official list of Stress Safety Behaviors (which I am not at the moment), I’d probably include these:

Sleep: getting regular and adequate sleep – not feast or famine approaches to the weekly rotation, where you pretend you can “get by” on four hours during the workweek and really make it all up to your brain with a long sleep on Saturday.

Move regularly and adequately. Exercise, appropriate to your overall health and physician’s guidance, is essential. The machine needs regular movement to function properly.

Limit exposure to negative influences. Don’t feed your envy, your insecurities, or your bad habits.

Minimize exposure to media and people that encourage you to compare yourself to other people.  Do you think it’s a coincidence that so many magazines and websites feature articles about improving oneself – and a surfeit of advertisements for products that will, in theory, improve those things?

Treat Sabbath time seriously. Set aside one day each week for renewal. Pray, rest, read, enjoy time with family and friends, play, create.

Journal. There are lots of ways to journal. There’s the quick “5 things you’re grateful for” at bedtime journal. There are prayer journals and journals that are brief paragraphs on the events of the day. Maybe it’s that annoying journal assignment your therapist gave you. The act of writing – more than just “thinking about it” – brings more of your brain into the process. This way, for example, you benefit more from noticing good moments during the day, recollecting them in the evening, writing them down, and seeing your words on the page.

Positive stress safety behaviors are simple, common sense…but they can appear to be just one more thing to keep you from getting things done. If you think, for example, that a short walk is just a waste of time, that you’d be better off using those fifteen minutes for the big mess at hand, well, that might be true if that were, in fact, what would happen. But if the thing that would actually happen was a big sigh or a venting of angry frustration and the welcome distraction of a text message from a friend – well, then, the short walk to breathe deeply, move quickly and focus yourself for action might be less of a time-waster than it seemed.

If you’ve taken a look at the task manager window on your computer, you know there are dozens of programs running even though you may be only engaged in one. Start clicking on random programs to turn them off and watch the warnings pop up that this will interfere with the proper functioning of the computer. It’s the same with these sleep and stress safety behaviors. The people who do these things do them consistently, even when things are smooth and rolling along just fine.  These habits operate like a background program, always running. They keep the system working properly but without a big fuss. Turn off, or pause, those background programs and the system stops working properly, or perhaps just shuts down entirely.

Even good programs need updates. Taking that weekly break gives you a chance to notice if you need to make changes to the routine. Ignoring necessary updates usually makes the whole system a bit glitchy.

Are we now voting on mental health?

Here in Florida, we have a process in which citizens can gather enough signatures and put an initiative on the ballot to alter the state constitution.

I vote no, even if in principle the idea seems good, because I don’t think that a majority vote is the way to treat a constitution. I would vote no, even if the amendment proposed to preserve, in perpetuity, the tax-exempt status of dark chocolate due to its obvious necessity to life. The whole idea of a constitution is that it sets forth basic principles: natural law, the essentials. All other laws and rules get held up to it to see if they fit within the boundaries of that constitution.  

In the upcoming election, Floridians will be asked to vote on a proposed amendment that would legalize non-medical marijuana for adults age 21 and over in Florida.  My libertarian side doesn’t much care what people do until it impacts other people. People who mess up their brains with drugs often seem to feel entitled to drive; ultimately, they demand their healthcare be paid for by other people; they clutter up emergency rooms, and do all sorts of other things that do impact others, making drug use a social, not a merely personal, issue.

Professionally, this deserves a resounding “no.” Not just because popular votes are not the way to treat a constitution; but because there is so much information not being openly and clearly presented on this.

To begin with, it is fairly laughable that there is so much so-called medical use of marijuana, when the research is sketchy for even the handful of possibly legitimate uses.  Anxiety? Insomnia? Marijuana is practically a recipe for anxiety, and in fact, can lead to very severe anxiety, especially among younger users.

Secondly, most people have been effectively shielded from information on the impact of marijuana on mental health, physical health, and crime. Why? Whose interest is served by hiding the number of ER visits for psychosis, panic, and/or hideously violent vomiting due to marijuana or other forms of THC use? Whose interest is served when the impact of THC in criminal activities is hidden? There is evidence that use of the modern, stronger forms of marijuana is leading to substantial increases in psychosis, self-destructive behavior and violence against others. Most people seem quite unaware of this. Did you know that the emergency room visits due to marijuana use – psychosis, panic and/or “scromiting” (screaming and vomiting) increased 53 to 400% in the first few years, from city to city? Or that even in Europe, the rate of marijuana psychosis slipping into schizophrenia has increased between 300 and 400% in the past twenty years?  In Colorado, a tragic experiment in progress on pot legalization, emergency room visits related to marijuana use increased 500% in the 5 years post-legalization, with severe psychiatric symptoms including psychosis and panic attacks. Then there is the pain and terrifying projectile vomiting typical of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.

Critically, marijuana is not safe. It is prescribed medically (despite the evidence being rather variable and inconclusive) with a shrug: “well, the possibility of benefits outweighs the risks.” Fair enough; no reasonable person is worried about someone who needs appetite support or help with pain while in treatment for cancer or AIDS having long-term effects from marijuana; the possibility of benefit outweighs the risks.

That doesn’t make it safe. In 2021, about one-third of high school seniors were using marijuana in some form. We ought to be very worried about the effects on teenagers and young adults, whose brains are still in development and whom, evidence shows, will have long-term impacts years after they have stopped using marijuana. That, of course, assumes that they stop. About 17% – 1 in 6 – of people who start using marijuana in their teens will become addicted. The addiction rate is about 9% for adults, and that is old data from 2015, and thus trails the upticks in use and in potency.

The increased risks, especially for young males, for unremitting anxiety, psychosis, and a lingering apathy and lack of initiative ought not be brushed off or laughed off with stories of the late 1960s. Then, the available marijuana caused hallucinations for many people and was far less potent that modern varieties. In the past 40 years or so, the potency has increased about 4-fold.  For adolescents, the rate of suicidal ideation triples in those with cannabis use disorder; the rate of depression nearly triples; truancy, fighting, poor concentration all increase markedly with regular cannabis use.

Interestingly, we are urged to accept psychiatry when it comes to destigmatizing mental disorders and treatment, but this enthusiasm for psychiatric expertise melts away when it comes to legalizing weed in all its forms. The American Psychiatric Association still officially opposes the use of marijuana, noting it is not research-supported for psychiatric diagnoses and bears substantial risks for psychiatric side effects. The experts are discounted on this one thing. What could possibly drive that behavior?

Stepping back and gazing at these points – and I am sure there are others – I ponder why there is so much interest in promoting this particular amendment.  Is it because, as the old Judas Priest song goes, “Out there is a fortune, waiting to be had”? Is it really the case that so many people who are enthusiastic about bossy rules about the size of people’s American flags, house colors or the time people roll out their trash cans are libertarian on this one thing? How will they feel when it is their son or daughter who slips away into depression, relentless anxiety or psychosis?

The argument is made that legal marijuana will be pure – not laced with fentanyl or other deadly substances. Assuming this is the case, and that there arises no underground market to avoid taxes – moonshiners versus revenuers, remember? – the question remains as to whether the risk is worth it in terms of psychiatric and gastric impacts.

Who will pretend, later, to not have known how dangerous what will no doubt be called something like “Big Weed” really was, and rush to sue because of brain damage, the loss of loved ones to suicide or cancer? What about those whose death is due to initiating violence while “high” and being killed by someone in self-defense? What class action suits will emerge to right the wrongs of mass hospitalizations for psychosis and its long-term medical management? Will it in fact be the same ruse of not-knowing used against tobacco, despite its having been referred to as “coffin nails” even in the 1800s? And beyond these major effects, what about the many lives and talents wasted by indifference and ennui as the years-long lingering apathy steals young adulthood and early middle age?

What would make sense:  this proposition as a possible law, not as an amendment, with publicly available hearings and testimonies from all sides: those incarcerated for years for petty possession charges and those whose loved ones spiraled into psychosis and suicide.  Let’s hear sworn testimony and evidence from medical experts on both sides and statisticians who can break down the data on crime and medical impacts.  Then, having heard the information, we can, through the legislative process, pass a law that adheres to the principles of the state constitution and best suits the facts of the situation.

The Best Years

When I was in high school, many adults told me I ought to really enjoy those years because they were “the best years of [my] life.”

Well, for me, high school itself was not, overall, such a great time, and having a bunch of grownups assert that it would turn out to be so was not encouraging at all. From where I am now, I feel sorry for a lot of those adults, because if that was their experience, they must have had pretty miserable adult lives.

Very often, we’ve adopted the idea that some certain time comprises the “best years of life.”  Consider the people who postpone marriage and family because they believe that their 20’s are “the best years of life” and they want to be “free” to travel/build a career/be self-indulgent/whatever.  Some of them will regret later that they did not make different choices (ask any therapist, priest, minister or rabbi).

On the other hand, some of us have our lives unfold in a different order: responsibility precedes higher education, and career-building comes largely after active-duty parenting. What, in the long haul, did I “miss out” on? Not a thing, and this was clear all along the way because I refused to take the bait on some certain time being “the best years” as if it were a prize category.

How about framing things up this way: each period of life is the “best” for what it is meant to be. As it says in Ecclesiastes, 3:11, “He has made everything beautiful in His time.”  And in its time, too.  There are some things that our 20s tend to be best for; and for some things, our 40s, 50s, 60s.  Yes, biologically, the 20s are peak time for having babies, and yes, forms of learning that require sheer memorization are best pursued prior to the 40s.  High-level analysis and wisdom, on the other hand, peak later than memorization and keep rolling, usually long after we start fumbling for the reading glasses we put down someplace and then find on our head.

There are different challenges, joys, and heartaches all along the way. Fortunately, our priorities change, or ought to. For God’s sake, who wants to be over 50 and as terrified of other people’s opinions as the typical 15-year-old? 

Are you tempted to feel discouraged? Does it feel as if all doors are shut because some events, some struggles, or perhaps your own regrettable choices, have meant you have lost a chance at the “best years”? Please reconsider. Make a different set of choices or just one different choice today. Then, perhaps, unexpectedly “best” years start today. You probably won’t be able to tell right away. Usually, we only see this when there’s enough distance to look back at today, tomorrow and the next day.

Why am I still here?

“Why am I still here?”

I hear that a lot. Perhaps you do, too.  The veteran who survived a firefight that took his friends; the person who woke up in the hospital to find they were the only survivor of a car crash that took their family; a survivor of a natural disaster that took many lives.  Many adults, perhaps most, have had such an existential episode. I’ve been in car accidents that could have killed me; survived acts of violence that could just as easily have tipped over into lethality, lived through serious illness. None of those are particularly unusual, and only mentioned to underscore the point.

“What do I live for now? What ought I be doing?”

That’s a tough one, yet it is the question every believer is tasked with as the subtext of life every day.  There is some chatter among the media that presuming that one’s survival is in God’s hands is some sort of unusual perspective. It is not my intention to speculate on any particular person’s interpretation of what that means. For those who find it perplexing, I hope to offer at least this Christian’s perspective. God never wants evil; it takes our free will for that to happen. Many of us wrestle with trying to figure out why God allows bad things to happen. Allowing something is not the same as wanting something, that’s for sure; every parent has to learn that lesson, fairly early on.

You may want your toddler to go to sleep. You may want that very, very, very eyes-burning-with-exhaustion much. But you have to allow the reality that the toddler will keep on singing songs, or whining, or coming out to complain. (If you do anything to “make” a child sleep, whatever adult is aware of it is required to report that to child protective services). C.S. Lewis does a much better job of explaining this particular point.  God, of course, chooses to allow or not. I’m not going to understand why because I am not God. God creates everything and I can do not a thing, even catch a breath, unless God wills it.

Our job is to figure out what God wants from us in each emerging situation, whether the situation itself was His will or not. For believers, every breath is a gift; there is no guarantee of another. Pondering what we are to do with these circumstances and assuming God has a preference in terms of our choice of action is not a big stretch.

So, for a Christian, God did not want Corey Comperatore to die in gunfire, protecting his family. It was not God’s will for the gunman to shoot. Mr. Comperatore clearly discerned his purpose was to protect at all costs. He had, apparently, discerned this over and over until his reflex towards self-sacrifice looked “automatic.” That seems to be a sign that his formation into the nature of Jesus Christ, the nature of complete self-giving, was something he had truly embraced.

And now, everyone left behind must discern what God asks of them in this new, tragic circumstance. Over the course of years and months, his family will each have to discern how to restructure life and find a different path forward. Friends and neighbors will need to discern, ongoing, how to provide friendship and support when the months pass and the spotlight of media attention fades.

The question doesn’t necessitate a tragedy, such as an accident, tornado or an attempted assassination. It is a perennial question: every person mourning infertility, every widow, widower, and bereaved parent.  Adolescents are supposed to wrestle with it; the elderly are, too. And all along the way, it is the question every thinking person ponders when transitioning to a new stage of life. We ask it at those times, too, that are both joyful and sad; a child grows up and successfully leaves the nest: mission accomplished; but what is my purpose now? Retirement comes; well, then what? What is your purpose now, beyond a vague sense of perpetual recess?

Being Christian means striving to be conformed to the nature of Jesus Christ. That means seeking not just to avoid being “bad” but attempting to do God’s will in every situation.  Is it “bad” to spend an entire lazy weekend afternoon with a pot of tea, a good book and a handful of chocolate? Especially on the Sabbath? No, lemon ginger tea and Lady Gregory’s book of Irish folklore, edited by W.B. Yeats, don’t make the list of “do-nots,” but the entire afternoon? When a friend needs a caring ear or a letter? When a nagging thought keeps intruding with that starts with, “I really need to reach out to…” maybe the “not a bad thing” needs to step aside and yield to the “better thing,” a “because” for the moment.

And, when you’re wrestling with the big questions of life, the little “becauses” become a path through the dark places.

Mom Wisdom: See, I wouldn’t like that

My mom has much wisdom, and it is often compressed into a succinct statement. One such statement is the beautifully versatile, “See, I wouldn’t like that.”

It is a thoughtful, personally disclosing and completely nonjudgmental response to all sorts of statements and behaviors. 

A distant relative has gotten an uncomfortable looking piercing. See, I wouldn’t like that, having a hole in my lip. But it’s not my lip.

Another family member is an avid hunter, while she is a vegetarian. See, I wouldn’t like that. But I’m sure it’s good to save money on food and of course the poor animal had at least a better quality of life while it lasted than those poor animals trapped in commercial stalls.

An elderly family member is planning a hiking and camping trip in the mountains. Well, good for her, but I wouldn’t like that. I’m sure she’ll have fun.

She will not pretend to agree with an opinion to keep the peace; she will not be abrasive or confrontational about it, either. She will not pretend that she, too, would want to skydive or travel someplace with large insects or otherwise engage in activities that she finds unappealing. She will listen, ask lots of questions, show genuine interest in the topic, seek to understand the other person’s enthusiasm, be encouraging and may also remark, well, see, I wouldn’t like that.

We have, to some extent, adopted this expression. Even when making an observation about something, such whether to go to the local First-Friday concert when the music is not a genre we enjoy, no criticism is necessary, just the agreement that lots of people will really enjoy it but, see, we wouldn’t like that.

I wonder what changes would ripple out if more people, instead of criticizing others for thinking or doing differently, the first stance was that respectful curiosity followed by a personal reflection that has nothing to do with whether the other party is “right” or “wrong.”  The alternative is a world where people fight or even cut one another out of their lives for matters that are more personal opinions than principles and too often, too little effort is made to find some common ground. And, see, I wouldn’t like that.